COMPILATION OF KEY FINDINGS & IMPRESSIONS-ISSUES

DAVIESS COUNTY HEALTH NEEDS ASSESSMENT

RELEASED AUGUST 15, 2000

(Prepared by Rodney Berry 8/25/00)

Return to OWENSBORO-DAVIESS COUNTY HEALTH 2000 REPORT

 

Contents

Health Status

Disease Burden

Health Behaviors

Health Care Access

Health Insurance

 

HEALTH STATUS

Key Findings:

Impressions-Issues:

Back to Contents

DISEASE BURDEN

Key Findings:

Impressions-Issues:

 Back to Contents

HEALTH BEHAVIORS

Key Findings:

Impressions-Issues:

Back to Contents

HEALTH CARE ACCESS

Key Findings:

Impressions-Issues:

Is this purely a marketplace determination? Are there community-based models that lead to affordable deductibles and co-pays?

 Back to Contents

HEALTH INSURANCE

Key Findings:

Impressions-Issues:

Other Issues Raised:

The following report provides a comprehensive picture of the health status, access to health care, and health care coverage for the people of Daviess County. The picture has different views. The information from the report came from several sources, community focus groups, telephone surveys, personal interviews, and data from state and national sources. The information was analyzed and summarized using quantitative and qualitative methods. The results were compared to the Healthy People 2010 goals.

Voices of the people

Focus groups.

Twenty-three people participated in five focus groups held in Owensboro/Daviess County, Henderson County and Ohio County. The focus groups were conducted November, 1999 by Dr. Jim Applegate and Annie Forsythe, a doctoral student in health communications. The majority of the participants were White-non Latino (96%) and female (83%). Over half had a college degree of some kind, but 17% had not completed high school. One-third had an annual income of less than $25,000; another third earned between $25,000 and $50,000; and the remainder earns over $50,000. Family size ranged from 1 to 6 with the majority (64%) having 3 or more people in their family. Over half had private insurance coverage, 26% had Medicaid, 13% Medicare, and 9% had no insurance coverage.

The focus groups were asked about Health Insurance Coverage, Continuity of Care, Preventive and Medical Services, Accessibility to Health Care, and Health Care Priorities.

These are the messages that were heard in Daviess County:

Providers Voices

Mailed survey to physician providers.

A survey was sent to 281 providers in the seven GRADD area. The names of the providers were obtained from the state medical licensing board. A total of 70 physicians responded for a response rate of 25%, including those returned with bad addresses or who were no longer in the area. The physicians were asked some of the same questions as the random

digit dial Survey 2000 about the type of insurance coverage, access, ability to pay, and the health status for their patient population.

The physician respondents specialized predominantly in family practice and pediatrics (GRAPH A). The majority practiced in Daviess and Henderson Counties and had an average of 15 years practicing in the area. The type of health care coverage used by their payments was 39% private insurance, 34% Medicare, 17% Medicaid and 10 self-pay. Over one-fourth, 25.7%, of physicians were not taking new Medicaid patients. Physicians reported a wait to get an appointment from 13 to 15 days and this varied by type of insurance coverage the next available appointment time also varied slightly by type of insurance. The physician reported average office wait prior to being was 25 minutes and they spent an average of 18 minutes with each patient. Physicians reported that on the average they provided 12.4 hours of free care in a one-month period. Nearly one-fourth, 24.3%, of their patients do not get their medication due to costs and 24.3% delayed getting needed medical care or did not get it because of inability to pay. Only 8.6% of physicians have provision for translating for Hispanic patients. Overall physicians rated the health of their patients as good (45%), followed by very good (17.7%), fair (20.7%) excellent (1.4%), and poor (0.7%).

Interviews with non-physician providers.

Interviews were conducted with non-physician health care providers in Henderson, Fordsville, and Owensboro. These individuals represented the continuum of care including primary care, acute care, home care, adult day care, long term care and community based pharmacy. Providers were asked questions about the services they provided and the health status, health care access, and insurance status of the recipients of their services. The following themes came from the information they provided:

Back to Contents

Back to Top